[Just two more chapters — 27 and 28 — after this one, and we will have reached the conclusion of my tale of espionage and betrayal. Stay tuned — you’ve hung on this long.]

February 25, 1994: Homeward bound once more, and happily not on Aeroflot this time. But because my original booking had been through Rome, returning the same way turned out to be the least expensive route, even though there was no connecting flight and it meant an overnight stay in Rome. I had reserved a room at a small hotel near the airport and arrived around 11:00 p.m., well after the hotel’s dining room had shut down for the night. But one of the benefits of a boutique hotel is the personal attention they are able to pay to their guests, and this one was no exception. The concierge found a person still in the kitchen who was able to prepare some of the food that hadn’t been served at dinner, and delivered my light meal to me personally. It was delicious, and with a glass of Chianti to wash it down, I was able to sleep like a baby.

I awoke early the next morning — Saturday the 26th — in order to catch the hotel’s shuttle bus to the airport. As I was dressing, I again tuned in to CNN, this time to learn that there had been yet another shooting incident in Hebron, a Palestinian city in the West Bank of Israel. Would they never stop?!! I wondered. It was an ongoing tragedy; but as an American who lived geographically far removed from the problems of the Middle East, and this being years before acts of foreign terrorism reached our shores, I never thought of the effect it might have here in Italy. That is, until I got to the airport . . .

The lines in the terminal appeared endless. They snaked around the inside of the building to every airline counter, including mine. The police and military presences were heavy and heavily armed, many accompanied by their canine partners. This was Europe, where they had suffered their fair share of terrorist attacks; and I had forgotten that when things heated up in the Middle East, the response here was immediate . . . and impressive. So I found my line and waited as the security officer worked her way toward me.

When she finally reached me, she began by asking the usual questions: “What was the purpose of your visit to Rome, and how long were you here?”

Answer: “Overnight, just transiting.”

Logical next question: “Transiting from where to where?”

Oh-oh. My answer — “Moscow to Washington” — was clearly going to set off some alarms. And did it ever! Her next questions concerned the purpose of my visit to Moscow, where I had stayed and for how long, whether my luggage had ever been out of my sight, whether anyone else might have had access to it . . . And when I answered truthfully that I had stayed in an apartment and that yes, others had been alone with my bags for a while, she very apologetically said she would have to perform a search of my luggage. I responded that it was no problem, as long as I didn’t miss my flight, which she assured me would not happen.

And I said a silent prayer of thanks that I had had the good sense not to take Shvets’ $3,000, and even more so his son’s passport, from his mother. This was exactly the sort of thing I had been afraid of, although I certainly could not have known there would be an overnight Middle East problem. But there are many possible reasons for a baggage search — even a simple random check — and it was almost as though Mama Shvets had been hoping for that when she loudly insisted that I could hide the passport under my clothing. The things I thought about her and her precious son in those moments do not bear repeating, but I’m sure they’re not difficult to imagine.

In any event, the search was quick and respectful. Security officers are trained to read people’s reactions and body language, and I suppose she could sense that I wasn’t hiding anything. When she finished, she even took me up to the head of the line to be checked in, as a sort of apology for the inconvenience. The plane was boarded on time, and off we went.

I had a seat mate this time: an American woman, 40-ish, well-dressed, professional-appearing — someone I thought I might enjoy chatting with. But she was as silent as the American man on last summer’s Aeroflot flight. My usual get-acquainted questions — was this your first visit to Italy? business or vacation? what line of work are you in? — met with non-responsive, monosyllabic answers. She clearly did not feel like talking. I didn’t want to be intrusive, so I resigned myself to a long, quiet flight ahead and settled in with the book I had brought, thinking she might be more willing to talk a bit later. She wasn’t. We landed at Dulles on time, and she walked away without a word. So much for the friendly skies.

The next day, all hell broke loose.

First, there was Yuri Shvets to deal with. He was anxious to receive whatever his mother had sent back for him. The FedEx envelope with the passport was already en route (and actually arrived a couple of days later); but when he saw that I had brought only a letter and no money, and that most of his gifts for her had not made it into my luggage in the first place, he was livid . . . which was nothing compared to what I was feeling. I told him in minute detail of his mother’s performance and how irresponsibly, and even recklessly, she had behaved. His excuse was, again, that she was just a “simple Russian woman,” to which I replied, “Bull shit! She’s the mother of a KGB Major. Don’t tell me she doesn’t know how to behave in public.” I also let him know what had happened at the Rome airport. The conversation deteriorated from there, and I stopped just short of accusing him of trying to set me up — only because I had no proof. And because I was alone in my apartment with a very angry man. He finally took the bag and the letter and left, slamming the door behind him. I never saw or spoke to him again.

I called Eric on Monday to let him know I was safely back, and we made plans to get together in a day or so. In the meantime, I had caught up on the national and local news, which turned out to be full of the story of the CIA agent who had been caught spying for the KGB: Aldrich Ames, the man I had first heard of on CNN in Moscow. Folks there had shrugged it off as just another remnant of the Cold War; but here at home it was a big deal. Still, it had nothing to do with me.

Well, at least not directly, it didn’t. But as I read the details of his arrest, and the FBI’s actions in the days leading up to it, I realized that the coincidence in timing between that activity and my pending travel to Moscow was more than a little interesting. It was reported that Ames had been part of a CIA team scheduled for an official visit to Moscow, due to leave Washington on February 22nd — the very middle of the time I was also to be in Moscow — and that his arrest had been set for the 21st in order to forestall his leaving the country. But again I wondered: so what? I hadn’t even known the man existed.

And I had my own problems. Shvets’ book was soon to be released, and John Brockman was talking about pre-release publicity. My name was tied to both Shvets and Aksilenko, and I knew it was time to do damage control with Natalya at the Russian Embassy. This was not going to be pleasant . . .

Brendochka
5/25/23 (re-posted 9/16/24)

If you want to deprive a people of their national identity, a good way to start is by taking away their language and replacing it with your own. The rest — the economic, political and cultural changes — will then fall into place more easily.

Just ask the people of Belarus.

Now in his sixth term as president — despite the highly contested vote of the 2020 election — Lukashenko is an autocrat, a corrupt and devoted sycophant of Vladimir Putin, who is doing everything possible to strip Belarus of its independence and realign it with its Russian neighbor. Barely three decades after the collapse of the Soviet Union, in which Belarus was one of the fifteen Soviet republics, the transition is proving fairly simple.

Classes in most Belarusian schools are now being taught in Russian, which has been made the second official language of the country. Belarus’ nationalist symbols have been eliminated. Official business is conducted in Russian, as are most of the media programs. Hundreds of nationalist organizations have been shut down, and popular cultural individuals are being persecuted.

One citizen said, on condition of anonymity for fear of retribution:

“It is obvious that our children are being deliberately deprived of their native language, history and Belarusian identity, but parents have been strongly advised not to ask questions about Russification. We were informed about the synchronization of the curriculum with Russia this year and were shown a propaganda film about how the Ukrainian special services are allegedly recruiting our teenagers and forcing them to commit sabotage in Belarus.” In his son’s school, dozens of teachers were fired in recent years, and the Belarusian-language section of its website shut down. [Yuras Karmanau, Associated Press, September 14, 2024.]

One of the half-million Belarusians who have fled the oppression of their homeland is Svetlana Alexievich, recipient of the 2015 Nobel Prize for literature. Now residing in exile in Germany, she said in an interview:

“I understand that our Belarus is occupied . . . And who is the president there? Not Lukashenko. The president is Putin. The nation has been humiliated and it will be very difficult for Belarusians to recover from this.” [Id.]

Lukashenko himself has ridiculed his own native language, saying that “nothing great can be expressed in Belarusian . . . There are only two great languages in the world: Russian and English.” [Id.]

Anais Marin, the U.N. Special Rapporteur for Human Rights in Belarus, has said:

“The Belarusian language is increasingly perceived as a sign of political disloyalty and is being abandoned in favor of Russian in the public administration, education, culture and the mass media, upon orders from the hierarchy or out of fear of discrimination.” [Id.]

*. *. *

This is not what the people of Belarus want; this is what Vladimir Putin wants. As he fights to achieve dominance in Ukraine, he seeks also to take back Belarus, under the cloak of a Slavic reunification. In Ukraine, he unexpectedly met with the resistance of a populace — and a government — that are fiercely anti-Russian. In Belarus, however, he has a “president” who is not only on his side, but is deeply reliant on Russia for energy, and indebted in terms of existing loans: Putin’s Perfect Puppet.

Sorry, good people of Belarus . . . it’s practically a done deal.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/15/24

I’ve been sitting here in the wee hours, enjoying the quiet when I’m the only one still awake. And when I looked at the date, I realized that there are two birthdays coming up in the next eight days of people I have lost and will never stop missing.

Merna — my only sibling and best friend for life (in spite of all the youthful fights) — would have celebrated 91 years on Wednesday, September 18th. We would have gone to dinner, probably at our favorite little French cafe, Le Refuge, in Old Town Alexandria, Virginia . . . assuming we could both still walk, that is. Or we could simply have ordered Chinese takeout and watched a couple of old movies. It didn’t matter where we celebrated, just as long as we did it together.

And Emily — my precious, beautiful, brilliant granddaughter who left us a little over two years ago — would have been 29 on the 23rd. She crammed so much living into the nearly 27 years she was given, in spite of — or maybe because of — the difficulties with which she was born. All she wanted in life was to save the world. Given more time, she might have succeeded.

They say the grief fades, or gets less intense with time. I don’t find that to be true. I think you simply learn to live with it.

Happy birthdays, Merna and Emi. I miss you both, every minute of every day, and even in my dreams.

Love,
Nana
9/15/24

It’s been yet another quiet news week insofar as the eight American hostages in Russia are concerned. But on Wednesday, I reported on a peculiar news item concerning a rumor — or it seems to be just a rumor so far — that some prisoners, including two unnamed Americans, might be released soon to their home countries. (See “A Get-Out-Of-Jail-Free Card For Russia’s American Hostages? Really?” – September 11, 2024.) I’m still waiting to hear more on that . . . with fingers crossed, as always.

Once again, there have been no names this week to add to the eight still locked away in Putin’s prisons. But all eight are still there, as far as I know.

And so we must remember them once again, and encourage them to stay strong and never give up hope — hope that negotiations for their release are moving forward behind the scenes.

In no particular order, they are:

Ksenia Karelina, dual U.S.-Russian citizen, recently convicted of espionage and sentenced to 12 years in prison for contributing $51.80 to an American charity providing aid to Ukraine.

*. *. *

U.S. Army Staff Sergeant Gordon Black, who was stationed in South Korea when he fell into a Russian “honey trap.” He was on his way back to his home in Texas, on two weeks’ leave, when he was lured to Vladivostok by the Russian girlfriend he had met in Korea. He was arrested in May of 2024 on charges of alleged larceny and murder threat, and sentenced the following month to a prison term of three years and nine months.

*. *. *

Marc Fogel, a schoolteacher from Pennsylvania, was arrested in August of 2021 for possession of 0.6 ounce of legally-prescribed (in the U.S.) medical marijuana. In June of 2022 he was sentenced to 14 years in prison.

*. *. *

Robert Romanov Woodland, a dual US-Russian citizen, was teaching English in Russia when he was arrested in January of 2024 for allegedly attempting to sell drugs. In July, he was sentenced to 12-1/2 years in a maximum security prison.

*. *. *

Robert Gilman, already in jail in Russia serving a 4-1/2-year sentence (later reduced to 3-1/2 years on appeal) for kicking a police officer in 2022, found himself facing added charges in 2023 of punching prison staff in the head, and later also attacking a criminal investigator and another prison guard.

*. *. *

David Barnes, an American citizen and resident of Texas, was arrested in January of 2022 while visiting his children, who had been taken to Russia from Texas by his Russian wife. He was charged and sentenced in the fall of that year to 21 years in prison for child abuse (allegedly occurring while in Texas), on his wife’s accusation. I really wish I knew more of this story!

*. *. *

Eugene Spector, a dual US-Russian citizen already serving a four-year sentence handed down in June of 2021 on a bribery conviction, received additional charges of suspicion of espionage in August of 2023. No other details have been found, as the evidence is labelled “classified.”

*. *. *

Michael Travis Leake, a rock musician and former paratrooper, was sentenced in July of this year to 13 years in prison on drug charges — specifically, suspicion of selling mephedrone, and organizing a drug trafficking business “involving young people.”

*. *. *

And again I ask: Are any of these prisoners actually guilty of the charges leveled against them? I don’t know. But I do know that the recent timing of a number of the arrests, and the speed with which they were brought to trial, is a clear indication of Russia’s intentional roundup of American citizens to be used as (what I call) Putin’s Pawns.

What they are, quite simply, are HOSTAGES. And they will not — MUST not — be forgotten. Let’s shorten this list to zero.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/15/24

Yesterday I said that I would be following reports of the White House meeting between U.S. President Biden and British Prime Minister Starmer concerning the recent threats emanating from the Kremlin over the use of long-range missiles by Ukraine.

Well, the talks were held; the press duly reported on the information they received; and . . .

Nothing.

Specifically, it was reported that “. . . no decision was immediately announced following a meeting Friday between Biden and Britain’s prime minister.” [Aamer Madhani, Ellen Knickmeyer and Matthew Lee, Associated Press, September 13, 2024.]

That verbiage — “no decision was immediately announced” — could simply be diplomacy-speak for “we’re not yet ready to comment.” And the Prime Minister did say that talks would continue at the time of the annual United Nations General Assembly meeting later this month. He added:

“This was a really important invitation from the president to have this level of discussion about those critical issues. Ukraine has a right to self-defense, and we’ve stood united.” [Id.]

So now it appears that we continue to wait a bit longer.

Meanwhile, the threats from Moscow have become more frequent and more ominous, with the nuclear option being tossed around like so much confetti. Prior to the White House meeting, President Biden was asked what he thought about Putin’s threat, and he bluntly replied:

“I don’t think much about Vladimir Putin.” [Id.]

Sorry, Vlad.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/14/24

Who is Sergei Karaganov?

His biography tells us he is a 72-year-old political scientist; a graduate of Moscow State University; head of the Russian Council for Foreign and Defense Policy; Dean of the Faculty of World Economy and International Affairs at Moscow’s Higher School of Economics; Presidential Advisor to both Boris Yeltsin and Vladimir Putin; and considered “close” to Putin and Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

He has also served on David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission (Japan, Western Europe and North America) since 1998; on the International Advisory Board of the U.S. Council on Foreign Relations; and as Deputy Director of the Institute of Europe at the USSR/Russian Academy of Sciences since 1983.

By any standard, an impressive resume. But is it possible that he is, after all, just a mad scientist on the loose?

And why is he suddenly in the news?

Because his voice is the latest to be heard among the several from Moscow who are proliferating such scare tactics as: “Russia should clearly state its willingness to use nuclear weapons against countries that ‘support NATO aggression in Ukraine.’” [Mark Trevelyan, Reuters, September 12, 2024.]

And he has the ear of Vladimir Putin.

He has been a driving force behind Putin’s decision to amend Russia’s nuclear doctrine, stating that its main goal “should be to ensure that all current and future enemies are sure that Russia is ready to use nuclear weapons.” And: “It is time to declare that we have the right to respond to any massive strikes on our territory with a nuclear strike. This also applies to any seizure of our territory.” [Id.]

But that, believe it or not, appears to be his soft side. He has also claimed in the past that the use of nuclear weapons would “save humanity,” and that Putin needs to ensure that “the will of the west to incite and support the Kyiv junta is broken.” [Katie Boyden, Metro.co.uk, June 14, 2023.]

Then he got serious:

“It is necessary that the west simply ‘back off’ and not prevent Russia and the world from moving forward.”

“The enemy must know that we are ready to strike a preemptive retaliatory strike for all of his current and past aggressions in order to prevent a slide into a global thermonuclear war.”

“The fear of nuclear escalation must be restored. Otherwise humanity is doomed.”

“Then [Russia] will have to hit a group of targets in a number of countries in order to bring those who have lost their minds to their senses.”

“This is a morally terrible choice — we use the weapons of God, dooming ourselves to severe spiritual losses.”

“But if this is not done, not only Russia may perish, but, most likely, the entire human civilisation will end.”

“We will have to make this choice.” [Metro, id.]

And he goes on, but . . .

This man is Dr. Strangelove, come to life. And while he does not hold a government position, or (supposedly) have a voice in official government policy, he does have a measure of influence as advisor to Putin. Add him to a gathering that includes fellow whack jobs Dmitry Medvedev and Aleksandr Dugin, bring in Vladimir Putin as the guest of honor, and you have the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse . . . with nukes.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/14/24

So she’s not a marine animal — not an otter, an orca, or a penguin — which I tend to favor. But she does like to swim, and she has captured my heart in spite of (or maybe because of) her rotund figure, flared nostrils, bristly little whiskers, and protruding ears. She is two-month-old Moo Deng — the cutest little West African pygmy hippo ever — and she lives in the Khao Kheow Open Zoo in Thailand, about 60 miles from Bangkok.

Her name, by the way, roughly translates to “bouncy pig,” which suits her completely. Say hello now to Moo Deng:

Pygmy hippos, also known as dwarf hippos, are native to West Africa and are classified as endangered by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature. There are believed to be fewer than 3,000 left in the wild, which makes Moo Deng even more special. [Nick Marsh, BBC News, September 13, 2024.]

She has, in fact, become an internet sensation in Thailand, and the number of zoo visitors has doubled since her birth. I would gladly join the crowds standing in line to see her, if she weren’t halfway around the world. So I will have to content myself with pictures like this one:

Thanks for posing, Moo Deng. You have made my day much brighter, when all the other news was grim and scary. I hope you know that — if for no other reason than your incredible cuteness — your life has meaning.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/14/24

And they’re not particularly popular there, either . . . yet they’re proliferating in an atmosphere shockingly reminiscent of the Soviet days of old.

Annoyed with your neighbor? There’s an easy way to get rid of her — just accuse her of spreading fake news about the Russian army. That’s what happened to Anna, a 46-year-old hairdresser from Pushkin, who was charged with “the public dissemination of knowingly false information about the use of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.” And the witness against her was her own neighbor. The two women had been friends for some time until arguments arose over a variety of issues. And this was the neighbor’s way of settling things: she denounced Anna to the authorities. [Steve Rosenberg, BBC News, September 12, 2024.]

In Moscow, Nadezhda, a 68-year-old pediatrician, was reported by the mother of a patient for saying something about Russian soldiers in Ukraine that upset the woman, whose ex-husband had been killed fighting in Ukraine. [Id.]

And an 87-year-old man was pulled off of a Moscow bus and beaten by a man who claimed to have overheard him make an insulting remark about Russian mercenaries fighting in Ukraine. The younger man and his son marched the elderly gentleman to the police, who fortunately — in an unusual instance — did not charge him. But he was obviously left shaken . . . and angry. [Id.]

The repressive regime of Vladimir Putin has become more onerous since the start of his “special military operation” — the invasion of Ukraine on February 24, 2022 — when he signed into law new legislation mandating the punishment for criticism of the military . . . specifically, for “discrediting the use of the Russian armed forces” or for spreading “knowingly false information” about the army. [Id.]

Putin also declared that “ . . . any nation, and even more so the Russian people, will always be able to distinguish true patriots from scum and traitors and will simply spit them out like an insect in their mouth, spit them onto the pavement. I am convinced that a natural and necessary self-detoxification of society like this will strengthen our country, our solidarity and cohesion . . .” [Id.]

And thus began the spate of cases of Russians reporting one another — students informing on teachers, professors on students, workers on co-workers — for opposing the war in Ukraine. And the old fears have returned.

Nina Khrushcheva, professor of International Affairs at The New School in New York, has said:

“What I find remarkable is how quickly Russian genetic memory has come back, and how people who didn’t live in those times suddenly act as if they did. Suddenly they are squealing on others. It is a Soviet practice but it’s also something about the Russian genetic code, of fear, of trying to protect themselves at the expense of others.” [Id.]

Is it genetic, a peculiarly Russian trait? Or is it something learned, passed down from a generation who lived through it once before to succeeding generations, much like a religious belief, or a prejudice? I don’t know . . . but it is obviously destructive of a civil society.

And it is being, not merely tolerated, but actively encouraged by Vladimir Putin himself, in the most revolting terms.

I wonder how he’ll manage to blame this one on the West.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/14/24

It wasn’t enough to imprison, and ultimately to kill, Alexei Navalny. Now they’ve gone after his attorneys as well, in a blatant case of “guilt by association.”

In the United States, as in all or most democracies throughout the world, a person accused of a crime is entitled to legal counsel. And the lawyer who accepts representation of a client can be comfortable in the knowledge that, even if his client is found guilty, he (the lawyer) will not be implicated in the crime simply by reason of his professional association with the guilty party.

It’s just logical.

But not in Russia.

On Thursday, three lawyers who had once represented the famed (and now deceased) dissident Alexei Navalny were brought to trial — having been arrested nearly a year ago, in October 2023 — on charges of involvement with “extremist groups,” as Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation had been labeled. They were accused of passing information from Navalny to his team while he was locked away in prison. [Associated Press, September 12, 2024.]

During his incarceration, Navalny was kept in solitary confinement, his only permitted visitors being his lawyers. They were the sole conduit between him and his family and friends — the only way he could let the outside world know that he was still alive and fighting. It was part of his attorneys’ job to “pass information” on his behalf.

Two other former lawyers for Navalny — Olga Mikhailova and Aleksandr Fedulov — have been placed in absentia on a wanted list, also accused of extremism. Both now live outside of Russia. [Id.]

But this is just the quickest and easiest way for the Russian government to discourage lawyers from accepting representation of those charged with political crimes. These three — Sergunin, Liptser and Kobzev — each face up to six years in prison; and conviction is virtually a certainty, as in all such cases. The trial is being held, as always, behind closed doors . . . in the town of Petushki in the Vladimir region, about 60 miles east of Moscow, rather than in Moscow where the three lawyers have been held in detention until now. [Id.]

The outcome is a given; only the length of their sentences remains to be determined.

Russian human rights group Memorial has classified Sergunin, Liptser and Kobzev as political prisoners, and has demanded their immediate release . . . for all the good it is likely to do.

In Russia, there is no presumption of innocence.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/13/24

No! Not those sabers!

Unfortunately, we’re not talking about Aram Khachaturian’s famous Saber Dance, for that would be evidence of the creativity and beauty of which the Russian soul is capable — the soul that seems to have been buried beneath the dung heap that is today’s Kremlin.

No, we’re talking about the metaphorical sabers that Vladimir Putin and his cohorts are so fond of rattling at the world whenever things aren’t going so well for them.

Which is now.

Putin’s “special military operation” — more accurately known throughout the world as his war against Ukraine — isn’t going according to plan. Of course, it hasn’t been from the very beginning. What was supposed to have been a smash-and-grab operation of a few days or weeks at the most, is now rapidly approaching the three-year mark, with no end in sight. His recent gains have been measured in figurative inches rather than miles, slowly, and only painstakingly achieved through the loss of countless thousands of young lives.

And recently, the unthinkable happened: Ukraine turned the battle against the invader, daring to attack Russian territory . . . the first time anyone has done that since the end of World War II . . . even coming as close as Ramenskoye, a district within the Moscow region just an hour’s drive from the Kremlin itself. One woman was killed, three people wounded, and high-rise apartments damaged and burned.

Yet the Russian rhetoric never changes. The truth is meaningless, and only the bravado remains. Following Tuesday’s attack, our old standby, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, had this to offer:

‘There is no way that night time strikes on residential neighbourhoods can be associated with military action.

”The Kiev regime continues to demonstrate its nature. They are our enemies and we must continue the special military operation to protect ourselves from such actions.” [Lidia Kelly, Guy Faulconbridge and Andrew Osborn, Reuters, September 10, 2024.]

Pardon me, Dima, while I drag out the laughing man again:

Thank you; that always makes me feel better.

Once again, I have to ask, even though I’ll never receive an answer: Do you really believe this sh*t that you throw at us??!!! Do you honestly believe that we don’t remember who started the f*cking war??!!! Well . . . do you, Dmitry?????

And of course, we’ve heard from the likes of Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, tossing about the old nuclear threat . . . though he always does that, doesn’t he?

Then we were told that Russia’s official protocol as to the permitted use of nuclear weapons was being amended . . . as though that protocol was ever going to stop them from doing what they damn well pleased in the first place.

But now, we have an added feature. Ukraine has for some time been pushing the United States to permit the use of U.S. long-range missiles to strike inside Russia, whereas they have thus far only been available for use against Russian troops within Ukraine. And Putin has regularly threatened reprisals if that were to happen.

This week, however, he has taken it one step further, telling reporters on Thursday:

“This will mean that NATO countries — the United States and European countries — are at war with Russia. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the essence of the conflict, we will make appropriate decisions in response to the threats that will be posed to us.” [Avery Schmitz, CNN, September 12, 2024.]

And that, I’m afraid, is no laughing matter.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
9/13/24

Postscript: As of this writing, British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer is in Washington with U.S. President Joe Biden to discuss Russia/Ukraine issues. Immediately upon returning to London, he is scheduled to fly to Rome to meet with Prime Minister Georgia Meloni of Italy, which presently holds the rotating presidency of the G7 group of industrialized nations.

You can be sure I will be following the reports of those meetings as they are made available.