Category Archives: Uncategorized

8/29/24: An Unholy Triumvirate: The Moscow Militia, the KGB, and the Russian Mafia (Ch. 17 – Posted 4/6/23)

Back in Moscow following my first visit to Kiev, I had settled into a comfortable routine of busy days and quiet evenings. I’d even begun venturing out by myself on weekends. The nearest Metro stop was an easy walk of only about a kilometer, along a pleasant pathway that skirted a patch of undeveloped, public parkland; and it was a quick ride from there into the city. More often, though, I would investigate my own neighborhood, finding handy little shops and introducing myself to the shopkeepers who didn’t quite know what to make of the newly-arrived American lady in their territory. Or friends would take me to some of the non-touristy areas of Moscow, and invite me to their homes for some good food and “kitchen conversation” — the traditional Russian after-dinner talks around the table that go on for hours. I finally came to understand why my grandparents had rarely used their living rooms: the kitchen was the true heart of the home.

One weekend, Vitold offered to drive me to an amazing place called Izmailovsky Park on the outskirts of the city, which featured a huge weekend open-air market that quickly became my favorite place to find items for the apartment: hand-woven rugs, hand-embroidered tablecloths, hand-crocheted bedspreads, hand-sewn curtains — everything beautifully handmade. And there was the odd trinket, like the famous Russian matryoshka (nesting doll) — a couple of which are staring across the room at me even now, thirty years later, as I write this chapter.

Then one day the office phone rang, and I answered it to hear a man’s deep voice introducing himself as Mikhail Pashkin of the Moscow Militia — and specifically, head of the Moscow Police Workers’ Union. I waved Lena over to the phone to be sure I didn’t miss anything, as Pashkin was, of course, speaking Russian. She was understandably a little nervous, since no law-abiding (or other) Russian citizen wants to be involved with the law enforcement authorities for any reason, even over the phone. And we’d already had one unannounced drop-in by a uniformed officer, “just checking to see how things are going.” Why had we become the beneficiaries of such loving attention? Surely, I thought, they must have better things to do. Did they check up on all registered foreign organizations this way? Quite possibly. Or was there something special about ours? My association with Aksilenko, for example? There was no way of knowing.

This day, however, Officer Pashkin was calling to invite me to visit him at Militia Headquarters, known to Muscovites by its infamous street address, Petrovka 38. He had heard of our Foundation and was interested in obtaining — gratis, of course — a quantity of our Veggieburger product “for the widows and orphans of Militia officers killed in the line of duty.” A nice way of making it impossible to refuse.

Militia HQ, Petrovka 38, Moscow

As luck would have it, the head of our Foundation, Gil Robinson, was due to arrive in Moscow in a few days. I relayed that information to Officer Pashkin, and we scheduled a meeting several days ahead in order to include Gil. That gave me plenty of time to work up a good case of nerves. But from a practical point of view, I decided it was better to have friends in certain places, in case I ever needed a favor. Spoken like a true Russian citizen.

A few days later, Gil arrived as scheduled. He decided that Maya should accompany us on the visit to Petrovka, mainly because she was the most self-assured of our three interpreters and least likely to be intimidated. So off we went at the appointed time, with Vitold driving but refusing to enter the scary building with us. He would wait in the car, no matter how long it might take, but would not set foot inside. We had been given directions, not to the main headquarters, but to a small, dilapidated old building around the corner. The guard at the desk was expecting us, and accompanied us up the stairway to the third floor (there was no elevator), gratuitously pointing out along the way the “interrogation room” on the second floor — mercifully unoccupied at the moment.

Oh, please! Was that really necessary? Did he actually think we’d enjoy a touch of gallows humor to begin our day? Speaking for myself, I could have done without it.

“Spill it, dirtbag!”

On the third level, three men were waiting in a small — really small — office: one seated behind an old, somewhat scarred desk, and one standing to either side and slightly behind him. There were three mismatched chairs on the front side of the desk for us. And that’s all there was room for in the office; it wasn’t exactly the executive suite. Gil took his seat in the middle, flanked by Maya to his right and me to his left.

The man seated at the desk was, of course, Mikhail Pashkin. He was movie-star handsome, dark-haired, with shoulders, pecs and biceps that strained at the seams of his short-sleeved, light blue shirt. This was not a man you would ever challenge to an arm-wrestling contest. If his intention was intimidation, he succeeded magnificently. (All right, now I’m starting to sound like a Mickey Spillane novel. Enough of that.)

Pashkin introduced the uniformed man to his left (our right) as Militia Officer Kostylev. And on Pashkin’s other side, now perched casually on a windowsill, was a pleasant-looking man in khakis and a plaid sport shirt, who introduced himself as Bragin. Just . . . Bragin.

Mr. Anonymous

After we three had identified ourselves, Gil began by politely asking a couple of questions as to the specific jobs of our hosts. Pashkin talked a bit about his work within the Police Workers’ Union, and Kostylev said that as an officer in the Militia, he was also a member of the Union. Then Gil turned to Bragin and asked, “Are you also with the Militia?”

And that was when the fun began. Bragin simply shook his head and softly replied, “No.” Obviously a man of few words.

Now remember, please, that Gil Robinson was a former Ambassador-at-Large with the U.S. State Department — supposedly a trained diplomat, right? In Washington, and every other world capital, when someone gives you a non-responsive response like that, you don’t press them; you assume their job involves some sort of classified work. And Gil, of all people, should have remembered that. But did he? Oh, no. Instead, he asked, “Well, where do you work?” And when Bragin responded, “A different department,” Gil incredibly went on: “Well, what department is that?” And Bragin softly replied, “It doesn’t matter.”

At this point, as Gil prepared to push the envelope with yet another idiotic question, Maya and I began elbowing him in the ribs from both sides, saying quietly, “Gil, drop it.” “Let it go, Gil.” “Just leave it.” Maya understood; I got it; but the professional diplomat remained clueless. Meanwhile, Bragin had caught my eye. Seeing that I was shaking my head in embarrassed disbelief, he smiled and nodded knowingly at me. In that instant I sensed that Vladimir Bragin (I learned his full name later) had become my newest friend in Moscow. He then looked at Gil again, shrugged resignedly, and said, in Russian, “КГБ” — which Maya and I translated for Gil, in unison: “KGB.”

KGB USSR Badge

If the floor had opened up beneath Gil’s chair at that moment, he would have been a happy man. As it was, he was trapped in that little office, trying to worm his way out of a gigantic faux pas. His face turned several shades of reddish-purple, and he began to stammer. I believe the only word he actually managed to choke out was, “Oh.” To his credit, though, he did shift gears fairly quickly, turning from Bragin to Pashkin and asking what we could do for the good folks of the Militia; and the meeting then began in earnest.

When I looked again in Bragin’s direction, he was once more looking at me and smiling. You might say we bonded over Gil’s embarrassment, and I was to be the beneficiary of that connection throughout my stay in Moscow. He was my Russian krysha, literally “roof” — my protection — and it never cost me a thing. It didn’t change what he did for a living, of course, but he turned out to be a very likable fellow.

Now, you’re probably wondering where the Russian Mafia comes into play in this story. At that time in Russia — and I’m not sure how this may have changed under the current regime and with the rise of the oligarchs — it was difficult to know with whom you were dealing at any given time. The so-called “Mafia” families — actually just criminal gangs who named themselves after the Italian originals — were so seamlessly woven into the Russian hierarchy and society in general, you simply couldn’t avoid them.

Family Reunion

In the case of Pashkin and his buddies at Petrovka, it all had to do with the final distribution of the huge shipping container of Veggieburger we were able to deliver to them. Information we later received indicated that the widows and orphans had enjoyed little, if any, of it. All or most of it went in the front door and right out the back, directly onto the black market, earning a sizable profit for both the “wholesalers” and the “retailers.” And those operations were generally controlled by the various Mafia gangs. So while I spent those months in Moscow for the most part steering clear of the criminal elements, it proved impossible to bypass them entirely.

A Good Day’s Work

One example of the steps we took to protect ourselves was the safe in the apartment. The ‘90s were a time of rampant criminal activity in Russia, sometimes referred to as “The Great Mafia Wars.” There were daily drive-by shootings; burnt-out vehicles by the side of the road; and kidnappings or slayings of individuals as they entered or left their banks with large amounts of cash — much like living in Newark or Detroit. So we had a sturdy safe in one of the bedrooms in which we kept the thousands of dollars periodically carried over by Gil Robinson for payroll, rent and other expenses. As with the front door, it would have taken a bomb to get into that safe; and it relieved me of the need to go near a bank . . . ever.

*. *. *

When I was preparing to leave D.C. for Moscow that May of 1993, people had frequently asked whether I wasn’t afraid to be going to such a dangerous location. At the time, I had been living in the metropolitan Washington D.C. area for most of my life, and I simply pointed out to them that I was already in what was then known as the murder capital of the United States. The only difference, I argued, was geography. I had long since developed a “que sera sera” attitude, and didn’t think too much about the daily hazards of life. My philosophy was, and still is, that we’re all born with a pre-determined expiration date — though it’s not stamped on our bottoms like a can of beans — and if my time was due to come up in Moscow, then so be it. I was going to have a grand time while I could.

And so I did, for the most part. But there were nerve-wracking moments as well. One of those involved the aforementioned need for my continuing contact with Valentin Aksilenko. We kept our telephone communications brief and infrequent, and only actually met a couple of times during the entire summer. He seemed relaxed enough, but again, I attributed that to his years of KGB training. We would “walk and talk” — strolling outside in busy places near my apartment building to avoid any electronic bugs that might be hidden in the apartment — and I think I managed to appear nonchalant enough. But my insides always felt as though I’d swallowed a gallon of Mexican jumping beans. I fully expected at any moment to be pounced upon by a couple of big thugs, dragged into a car with darkened windows, and driven to an isolated spot where I would be shot in the back of the head and left for the crows to feed on. But then, I always did watch too many bad spy movies. Obviously, I survived without anything of the sort ever happening.

“Uh-oh!”

*. *. *

But there were other moments as well. It seemed that even a holiday — specifically, in this case, the American Fourth of July celebration — could turn scary in Moscow, and not just from any errant fireworks. Join me next time for that memorable episode, which still gives me the willies when I think about it.

So long for now,
Brendochka
4/6/23 (re-posted 8/29/24)

8/29/24: Oh, To Be the Chosen One!

Most of us are fully aware that we will never attain that lofty position, because it’s already occupied . . . by Donald Trump, of course.


And how do we know this? Because he has told us so, in no uncertain terms. His proof? That he survived the attempt on his life in Pennsylvania a few weeks ago. Clearly (to him), it was God’s hand that saved him, because God wants . . .

Wait! Donnie knows what God wants? What do they do . . . text each other?

Okay, let’s say he does know. And he has blessed us by sharing this information. What God supposedly wants is for America to be great again, which means that — you’ve got it — Trump must be elected in November.

Drawing from Facebook, unattributed


He even told Dr. Phil that his purpose in being here is to “save America,” and perhaps the world. He even claimed he would win California — California!!! — ”if Jesus were in charge of voting in the state” (you mean he isn’t?) — and that some people had received as many as seven postal ballots in 2020, thus inflating the Democratic vote (where he actually lost by 5,103,821 votes). [David Charter, The Times, August 28, 2024.]

He never will stop beating that dead horse.

He added that “The only thing I can think is that God loves our country and he [sic] thinks we’re going to bring our country back.” Asked by Dr. Phil if he believed he was spared for a reason, Trump replied, “Well, God believes that, I guess. We’ll have to see.” [Id.]

Maybe Donald Trump thinks he sees the hand of God. What I see is narcissism gone batshit crazy.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/29/24

8/29/24: The Incredible Life of Pavel Durov

In case you missed yesterday’s headlines, Pavel Durov, CEO of Telegram, has been indicted in France on charges of “complicity inn the distribution of child sex abuse images, aiding organized crime, and refusing lawful orders to give information to law enforcement.” [Joseph Menn, Washington Post, August 28, 2024.]

Pavel Durov

After four days of questioning — four days! — he has also been ordered to post a 5 million euro ($5.6 million) bond, and is barred from leaving France. With his multi-billion-dollar fortune, the bond should be no problem; but he’s not going to like being tied down in one place for any length of time.

And his 950 million users are not going to be happy at the prospect of possibly losing the protections of Telegram’s services, which include optional encryption of one-on-one conversations, and absolute privacy of all of their data . . . a good bit of which, it seems, is of a criminal nature. There are probably a lot of very nervous terrorists, kiddie porn distributors, and money launderers out there today — not to mention governmental and other users in Russia, Eastern Europe and the Middle East.

Oops!


But the principal questions remain: As the CEO of Telegram, is Pavel Durov liable for his clients’ actions? Or, alternatively, by refusing to turn over their information, is he complicit in their crimes?

As one who has nothing to hide, I find this fascinating, and particularly from a legal standpoint. I’m a firm believer in privacy and free speech. But I also despise seeing the scariest and smarmiest of criminals (and governments) getting away with their nefarious activities under the umbrella of freedom of speech.

Quite frankly, I would not want to be one of the judges in this case.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/29/24

8/28/24: The Many Mouths of Moscow

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has been silent this past week, hopefully away on a well-deserved vacation from what has to be an exhausting job. I can’t imagine having to keep up with the workings of Vladimir Putin’s mind day after day after endless day!

And in his absence, we’ve been hearing from various members of the Kremlin inner circle — a different one each time. Although the topics have varied, the message has been pretty much the same: The United States is to blame for everything bad that happens anywhere in the world. Right.


For example, on Monday Vyacheslav Volodin — Chairman of the State Duma (the equivalent of the Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives) — accused the U.S. government, with no evidence whatsoever, of being behind the arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov in France in order to be able to take control of his controversial messaging platform, saying:

“Telegram is one of the few and, at the same time, the largest internet platforms over which the United States has no influence. On the eve of the U.S. presidential election, it is important for President Joe Biden to take Telegram under control.” [Billal Rahman, Newsweek, August 27, 2024.]

Vyacheslav Volodin

Yeah, right . . . as though France is going to go through all of this just because we (or anyone) said “pretty please.” Are you nuts?

*. *. *

Also on Monday, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said unequivocally that U.S. involvement in Ukraine’s counter-offensive (he used the word “incursion”) in Russia’s Kursk region was no longer an accusation, but was now “an obvious fact”:

“Washington’s escalatory path is becoming more and more challenging. The impression is that [U.S.] colleagues have thrown away the remnants of common sense and believe that everything is permissible for them. Similar approaches are followed by their clientele in Kyiv.” [Lucy Papachristou and Guy Faulconbridge, Reuters, August 27, 2024.]

Sergei Ryabkov

First of all, the U.S. doesn’t have “clientele.” He must be thinking of Russia’s own “clients” — in Africa, Latin America, Eastern Europe . . .

And second, speaking of “[believing] that everything is permissible for them . . .” Again, are we looking into a mirror, seeing our own reflection, and confusing the left side with the right? Must be.

*. *. *

And then they brought out the big gun: Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who declared that the West is escalating the Ukraine war and “asking for trouble” by so much as considering Ukraine’s requests to ease restrictions on the use of foreign (i.e., U.S.) -supplied weapons. In his customary subtle manner, he continued:

“We are now confirming once again that playing with fire — and they are like small children playing with matches — is a very dangerous thing for grown-up uncles and aunts who are entrusted with nuclear weapons in one or another Western country,” he told reporters. “Americans unequivocally associate conversations about Third World War as something that, God forbid, if it happens, will affect Europe exclusively.”

He added that Russia was “clarifying” its nuclear doctrine. [Guy Faulconbridge and Vladimir Soldatkin, Reuters, August 27, 2024.]

Sergei Lavrov

Excuse me, Mister Minister. But have you conveniently forgotten about all those weapons and related technology you’ve been receiving from China, from Iran, and from God-knows-where-else? If there are any restrictions placed on the use of those weapons — say, for instance, in Ukraine — the world hasn’t seen any evidence of it during the past 30 months.

Not too hypocritical, are we?

*. *. *

And while all of these Kremlin officials were busily playing the blame game, what was the Russian military doing? Why, they were having a field day launching their most massive air attack across Ukraine since the start of the war, aiming their Chinese and Iranian missiles and drones at energy infrastructure, killing at least seven people, and causing power outages in several cities. [Svitlana Vlasova, Ivana Kottasova, Daria Tarasova and Christian Edwards, CNN, August 27, 2024.]

And then they moved in on the civilian residential areas — those very areas they claim not to target — in scores of regions, killing no fewer than another six people. In the city of Kryvyi Rih alone, three people were killed, another five injured, and one person — Serhiy Lysak, Governor of the Dnipropetrovsk region in which Kryvyi Rih is located — was still missing. And three more people were killed in drone attacks in Zaporizhzhia, an already hard-hit city in southeastern Ukraine. [Valentyn Ogirenko, Gleb Garanich and Oleksandr Kozhukhar, Reuters, August 27, 2024.]

Kryvyi Rih, Ukraine – August 27, 2024

*. *. *

You know, what really gets my goat is not the posturing, not the cover-ups, not the false accusations, the veiled threats, or even the outright bald-faced lies. What I can’t understand is how you — all of you Kremlin mouthpieces — can think that we in the West are stupid enough to buy your bullshit . . . or weak enough to cave in to it.

Because — surprise! — we’re not.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/28/24

8/28/24: Oh, You Are So Grounded!

It’s probably happened to you. You take your four-year-old into the Christmas Shoppe to buy some new ornaments for this year’s tree; you let him out of your sight for a nanosecond; and . . . smash! . . . you hear the sound, and somehow you just know who caused it. The sales clerk you couldn’t find to help you two minutes ago suddenly materializes; you explain and apologize, and you pay for the broken piece and thank your lucky stars it wasn’t an entire display.

“Oh, no-o-o-o!”

Then you gently scold your little one, explaining that this is why he shouldn’t touch things that don’t belong to him, knowing perfectly well he doesn’t understand and this won’t be the last time something like this happens. And you feel guilty when the tears begin to well up in his eyes, so you buy him an ice cream cone on the way home and all is forgiven and forgotten.

Simple, huh? After all, it’s not the end of the world.

But what if that ornament is a 3,500-year-old Bronze Age artefact, previously in perfect condition, on display in a museum in Israel, and it’s your four-year-old son whose curiosity gets the better of him?

After the Fall

Holy crap!

Well, if you’re very, very, very lucky, you will be in the Hecht Museum in Haifa, which has to be run by absolutely the nicest, kindest, most understanding people in the entire universe . . . because they didn’t turn the little boy, Alex, and his father over to the police, or set the kid on fire, or anything else. In effect, they simply said they’d have the jar restored. [Jack Burgess, BBC News, August 27, 2024.]

Seriously, that is how it was resolved. Little Alex was upset at first, because he had pulled at the jar slightly to try to see if there was anything inside, and he was startled when it fell over. He probably also was expecting to be yelled at, at the very least. (Although I should think Dad was also feeling a little guilty for not having tied Alex’s hands behind his back before entering the museum.)


Instead, the museum folks invited Alex and his family back for an organized tour. A museum representative, Lihi Laszlo, said:

“There are instances where display items are intentionally damaged, and such cases are treated with great severity, including involving the police. In this case, however, this was not the situation. The jar was accidentally damaged by a young child visiting the museum, and the response will be accordingly.” [Id.]

Now, that’s what I call civilized.

*. *. *

But what about the artefact itself? Why were it and its mates on display without any protection, obviously vulnerable to the vicissitudes of life . . . like the presence of four-year-old kids? The museum’s answer: because they believe there is a “special charm” in showing archaeological finds “without obstructions.” And they have every intention of continuing the tradition, despite little Alex’s mishap.

Before Alex got there

And it’s not as though these things are replaceable. Most likely used to carry supplies such as wine or olive oil, the jar dates back to a time between 2200 and 1500 B.C. It predates the era of the Biblical King David and King Solomon, and is characteristic of the Canaan region on the eastern Mediterranean coast. When discovered, it was considered an “impressive find” because of its intact condition. [Id.]

Just think about it. It survived more than three millennia without damage. And it took a four-year-old kid named Alex two seconds to destroy it.


Never, ever underestimate the power of children.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/28/24

8/28/24: Hey, Mexico . . . What’s Happening Now?

Just as we in the U.S. are facing a contentious election in November, our immediate neighbors to the south have recently been through one, with the inauguration of their new president, Claudia Sheinbaum, scheduled for October 1st.

But Mexico’s outgoing president, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, is still in charge for another month, and he doesn’t seem inclined to rest on his laurels during that time. He has been busily working on a package of constitutional changes that he hopes to push through the Congress, some of which — specifically major changes to the judiciary and some regulatory agencies — have both the U.S. and Canada concerned.

President Lopez Obrador

And President Lopez Obrador has not taken kindly to the criticisms lodged by the ambassadors from his northern neighbors. But rather than sitting down for a friendly chat, he has chosen to halt diplomatic relations with the U.S. and Canadian embassies.

“Sorry . . . what was that again?“

You read me correctly. At his daily press conference on Monday, he said the “pause” is with the embassies, and not the countries, and that relations would be reestablished once the U.S. and Canadian ambassadors are “respectful of the independence of Mexico, of the sovereignty of our country.” [Abel Alvarado, CNN, August 27, 2024.]

Now, ordinarily this would have seemed like just another little diplomatic kerfuffle that would no doubt be straightened out in a matter of days. But in light of President-Elect Sheinbaum’s inclusion of Vladimir Putin on her inaugural invitation list, and the fact that Mexico has not severed ties with Russia since the start of the war in Ukraine, the last thing we need is for our historically friendly neighbor . . .

Oh-oh . . .

Wait just a moment here. Those words — “historically friendly” — brought something back to my mind. They reminded me of Putin’s statement, when he congratulated Sheinbaum on her election, to the effect that Mexico is Russia’s “historically friendly partner in Latin America.” [See my post on 8/8/24: “What’s Going On In Mexico?”]

Now, in a perfect world, it is possible to have more than one friend at a time. But when you’re talking about Russia and the U.S. — or Russia and just about any Western country — that’s not necessarily the case.


And the very last thing the world needs at present is a diplomatic tug-of-war. We’re juggling enough explosive issues right now, thank you. So could we all — Mexico, Canada and the U.S. — please just sit down and talk this over like grownups, somebody apologize, somebody else accept the apology, and let’s get back to the business of keeping the world from imploding.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/28/24

8/27/24: Dear Dmitry Sergeyevich:

Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Sergeyevich Peskov

Or may I address you as Dima? I’ve written so much about you in recent months, I feel we are old friends.

Of course, not everything I’ve written has been complimentary, inasmuch as it has all been in the context of your position as Press Secretary for Vladimir Putin — who, it is safe to say, is not one of my favorite people. But you are not Putin. You have always appeared so much more agreeable, so approachable, so . . . well . . . cute, actually. As spokesman, you of course have something to say about nearly everything; and you deliver your comments with such ease and such sincerity, that I have often wondered whether you actually believe the bullshit that . . .

Oh, sorry — I didn’t mean to let that slip. But it’s out there, so let it lie.

In any event, I recently became curious as to how you came to hold the position of Kremlin spokesman. So I did the obvious thing: I Googled you. And I learned quite a bit!

I didn’t realize how long you have worked at Putin’s side — since he first became President of Russia, if not longer. And I’m afraid that in all those years, some of his less admirable traits may have rubbed off on you: lying with a straight face, for example.

At Putin’s side – 2000

What’s that? You say you don’t lie? Oh, Dima . . . that in itself is not exactly true. What about the very beginning of the “special military operation” in Ukraine? Even before it actually started — in January of 2022, to be specific — when you accused the United States of “fomenting tensions” concerning Ukraine, while it was your country’s troops amassing on the border . . . not ours. And on March 1st — less than a week after . . . oh, let’s be honest and call it what it is . . . after the invasion, you told reporters you didn’t want to comment on Russian military casualties, but insisted that “the Russian troops don’t conduct any strikes against civilian infrastructure and residential areas.”

Not wanting to comment is one thing; but that last part . . . if you don’t call that a lie, I can show you pictures of Mariupol, and Bakhmut, and Bucha. Like these:


Okay, that’s enough.

*. *. *

And during the 2011-2013 protests in Russia, when riot police were clubbing protestors, you were quoted as saying that “protesters who hurt riot police should have their livers smeared on the asphalt.” Really, Dima? Is that true? People who defend themselves against big scary guys in black riot gear, armed with clubs and Kalashnikovs, should be mashed into sidewalk pate? That actually sounds like something Medvedev would say, but surely not you!

How many OMON troops does it take . . . ?

*. *. *

Well, I suppose that’s all in the nature of your job — and a lucrative one it is, according to all reports. Not just your salary, but from other sources. They do say it’s all about whom you know . . . and you definitely know the right people. You’ve earned your place in the Kremlin hierarchy; you’ve obviously said and done all the right things along the way: sucked up when appropriate, and shut up when necessary. Well done.

So I thought I’d offer you this little tribute to let you know that someone out here in the West is paying attention when you speak. And on that subject, I’d really like to know . . .

When the hell are you coming back to work? I miss being able to quote you in my articles. By my count, it’s taken no fewer than four people to do your job for just one week.

Waiting . . .

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/27/24

8/27/24: Is the World Big Enough for Two Elon Musks?


Or is it “Elons Musk”? You know — like attorneys general.

Either way, the thought of pluralizing someone who is already bigger than life is overwhelming. Yet, it seems already to have happened.

In case you haven’t been following this week’s news closely enough, I’d like you to meet . . .


Pavel Durov, referred to by one source as “A Russian Elon Musk.” [Joshua Berlinger and Anna Chernova, CNN, August 26, 2024.]

Holy crap! Another Musk isn’t enough . . . he has to be Russian to boot??!!!

A brief bio: At age 39, he is the multi-billionaire CEO of Telegram — the controversial, ultra-secure, encrypted messaging service so popular with today’s terrorists, criminal gangs, governments, and others with the deepest and darkest of secrets to be kept. Born in St. Petersburg, Russia, he is a mathematical and programming genius who first developed VKontakte, Russia’s answer to Facebook; then went on to create Telegram. Like so many others, he ran afoul of the Putin regime when he refused to cooperate after they “requested” he disclose the very information his program was designed to protect . . . and then he left Russia.

Probably not exactly like that . . .

Durov now holds both French and Emerati (UAE) citizenship, plus one or two others. He lives in Dubai, and spends much of his time jetting around the world. When he landed in France earlier this week, he was arrested by French authorities for much the same reason that he left Russia: his firm belief in people’s absolute right to privacy.

And suddenly his name has become a household word: “Have you heard what happened to Pavel Durov?” “Oh, my God, they’ve arrested Durov!” “How can they possibly charge Pavel for protecting his clients?” “Who the hell is Pavel Durov?”

Okay, I snuck that last one in because there are probably a few people out there who still don’t know who he is. But they will.

Of course, celebrity inevitably brings with it a loss of your own privacy. People want to know more about you — everything, in fact. And this man has made a practice of being, if not secretive, at least enigmatic. But bits and pieces are becoming known, such as . . .

. . . his claim to have fathered at least 100 children.

Ordinarily, that would have sent the real Elon Musk into a frenzy of jealousy and formulating a plan to catch up — a Herculean task, since he “only” has 12 of his own, leaving 88 to go. But Durov cheated; he admits to having provided sperm donations over some 15 years, which in itself is . . . no, never mind . . . whereas Musk . . . uh, forget it. Just thinking about those two. . . you know . . . is exhausting — and more than a little embarrassing.

It has been said that Durov “cuts the figure of a mysterious, globe-trotting tech bro with Mark Zuckerberg’s prodigiousness, Jack Dorsey’s bizarre lifestyle habits and Elon Musk’s libertarian streak.” [Id.] He is also sometimes found shirtless . . .


. . . which oddly reminds me of his old nemesis, this guy:


Sorry, Vlad . . . no contest. Although there is the age difference to consider.

Now, these three men, and a few others of their ilk, share a number of characteristics: intelligence, drive, focus, ruthless ambition . . . and ego. Because to be so sure that you have that “it” factor that will lead you to success, you have to have an over-abundance of self-confidence, a conceit that will not allow you to fail.

And there you have what I think is the perfect brief description of the not-so-mysterious Pavel Durov: an ego on legs . . . with killer abs.

Just sayin’ . . .

Brendochka
8/27/24