Was it really much ado about nothing . . . just a hissy fit between two mismatched people spending too much time in each other’s company? Is that what we’ve been wasting our days worrying about?
The thing is, when an average couple — married or otherwise — engage in a name-calling contest, or an outright brawl, it’s usually a private matter. Unless one kills the other, it doesn’t generally make the headlines.
But this was no ordinary couple. This was the richest man on Earth hurling insults and accusations at the supposed leader of the free world, who of course reciprocated with threats and a few snarky comments of his own. And it was all very public indeed.
Then, just as we wondered whether it meant the end of SpaceX, and Tesla, and that amorphous organization known as DOGE . . . well, suddenly it all began to cool down.
First, Donald Trump told that bastion of truthful reporting, the New York Post, that — while he was a “little disappointed” about their fallout, he held “no hard feelings” toward his former best buddy, Elon Musk. [Danai Nesta Kupemba, BBC News, June 11, 2025.]
And Musk took the hint, writing on X that he regrets some of the things he may have said about Trump . . . that “they went too far.” He even deleted many of his posts, including one that had called for Trump’s impeachment. [Id.]
Well, that sounds like a mutual apology to me, albeit without actually hearing the word “sorry.”
So should we now expect to see Musk’s face back at Mar-a-Lago? Are we to assume we’re meant to forget the whole thing happened and find some new scandal with which to amuse ourselves? How disappointing. And how dull life will once again become without “The Donnie and Elon Show” to entertain us.
But wasn’t it fun while it lasted! And it did distract us, just for a while, from more serious matters, like the situations in Ukraine and Gaza, the deployment of federal troops to Los Angeles, the transfer of enriched uranium from Iran to Russia, the cost of the upcoming birthday bash in D.C. on Saturday, and the decimation of FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) at the very start of hurricane season.
Hey, wait a minute! You don’t suppose that was the whole idea . . . ?
You would think they’d be thanking their protector and benefactor for saving their skins . . . but I suppose that would be asking too much from the lowest of the low.
I’m talking about five leaders of the far-right group known as the “Proud Boys” — the gang of thugs who tried to overthrow the U.S. government by storming the Capitol on January 6, 2021, and were subsequently convicted of seditious conspiracy and similar charges, receiving prison sentences of varying lengths, the longest being 22 years.
U.S. Capitol – January 6, 2021
Their names are Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joseph Biggs, Zachary Rehl, and Dominic Pezzola. They were pardoned by Donald Trump on the day of his inauguration — January 20, 2025 — along with approximately 1,500 people involved in the riot that threatened the lives of our nation’s lawmakers and law enforcement officers.
And now they are free to roam the streets once more, potentially plotting other violent and destructive crimes, because Donald Trump said, on the day he signed their pardons:
“These people have been destroyed. What they’ve done to these people is outrageous. There’s rarely been anything like it in the history of our country.” [Nadine Yousif, BBC News, June 6, 2025.]
And in so doing, he gave them — the five named above — the ammunition they needed to file a $100 million lawsuit against the U.S. government, claiming their rights were violated during their prosecution by “FBI agents and prosecutors . . . [allegedly] motivated by personal biases [in order] to punish and oppress political allies [of Trump]. [Id.]
The suit, which names the U.S. Department of Justice as defendant, alleges that the five plaintiffs were subject to “egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system,” and accuses prosecutors of “evidence tampering” and “witness intimidation.” The suit further calls the prosecution “corrupt and politically motivated.” [Id.]
With an entire nation watching in real time, and unmistakable photographic evidence of their criminal actions, their guilt is undeniable. Under the laws of the nation they had been trying to destroy, they were afforded due process, found guilty, and properly sentenced. In the “wild west” days of this country, they most likely would have been hanged on the spot. But now they’re crying “foul” — and suing the government that has just set them free after serving minimal time.
These are the sort of people that Donald Trump sees fit to set loose on society — while rounding up thousands of immigrants who, for the most part, have done nothing wrong.
These are people he does not see as a danger to our civilization, while he deports or bans bright, honest, hard-working foreign students from our finest universities.
These are the people he defends, because they support him. Never mind that they are the dregs of humanity.
*. *. *
I can’t imagine any honest judge giving credence to their lawsuit. But in a way, I would almost like to see them win their $100 million. Wouldn’t that be the ultimate payback to Trump for his “good deed”?
Or will that be the day they decide to treat the country to a repeat performance?
So I was not amused when I was awakened by an unusually noisy thunderstorm early this morning — well, early for me, since I hadn’t gotten to sleep until around 3:00 a.m. Once awake, naturally I had to answer nature’s call before trying to go back to sleep; but when I opened my bedroom door, I found Dixie — the canine member of our family — lying in wait, seeking human comfort from the barrage of lightning flashes and thunderous crashes.
(When I’m feeling groggy and stupid, I sometimes lapse into bad poetry.)
I have a thing about dogs: I love them, but not their hair in my bed, which means that is the one place in the house where she is not welcome. So instead of returning there to finish my morning’s sleep, I headed for my den . . . with Dixie in hot pursuit, of course. And once I had spent a half hour comforting her (she really knows how to milk the attention), I realized I was hungry.
Once again, my return to bed was put off, this time in favor of a bit of breakfast, during which I switched on the TV and lost myself in another episode of my most recent binge-watch: “Downton Abbey.”
No, this was definitely not my first, or even second, involvement with the Crawley family of Downton. But every couple of years, I am compelled to watch it yet again, even though I know perfectly well what each episode will bring. It’s just one of those masterpieces of well-written, well-researched, and beautifully-acted fiction that drags you into it, leaving you wishing you were actually part of it.
There are only a few like that, for me. Another was “The West Wing“ — recommended viewing for those who would like to imagine what the perfect U.S. presidential administration would be like, if there were any such thing. In fact, I saw a segment of that show being filmed years ago near my office in the Georgetown neighborhood of Washington, D.C., which was great fun.
And while traveling on that train of thought today, I happened to recall a series I had seen many years ago, called “Reilly, Ace of Spies,” starring Sam Neill. Those who know me won’t be surprised to learn that it is based on the life of one Sidney George Reilly (1873-1925), a secret agent with Scotland Yard’s Special Branch and later for the British Secret Service (now the SIS) who spied on various governments, including the Bolsheviks at the time of the Russian Revolution. Fascinating stuff for all you history buffs. (And there I go again, rhyming merrily along.)
It didn’t take long for me to find that that series is available on BritBox, to which I have a subscription. So you can guess what my next binge will be, right after I finish Downton Abbey.
*. *. *
And that, dear readers, is what I’ve done with a rainy, sleepy day: ignored the news headlines, neglected my books and my writing, and opted instead to waste the day with some good British TV.
But is it really wasted if I’ve enjoyed it? I don’t think so. As a matter of fact, I’ve found it to be quite therapeutic.
And now, I believe I have time for one more episode of Downton Abbey before dinner . . .
A few days ago, an article appeared regarding a U.S. citizen, Joseph Tater, having left Russia after a detention of nearly a year on charges of “petty hooliganism,” which he denied, and later also of using violence against a police officer in connection with an incident in a Moscow hotel in August of 2024. Following a court hearing in April of this year, he was transferred to a psychiatric hospital treatment for treatment.
According to Russian news agency TASS, Tater was discharged on June 6th because “the clinic had no reason to keep [him] and released him for outpatient treatment.” [RFE/RL, June 6, 2025.]
I had first read about Tater’s plight following his removal to the hospital, and commented on it on April 6th of this year, as follows:
“[Tater] was arrested in August of 2024 following a confrontation in an upscale Moscow hotel (unnamed). He allegedly became abusive and ‘behaved aggressively’ when asked to see his documents. He was refused accommodation at the hotel, and police were called; he later is said to have grabbed the arm of a police officer, which constitutes assault. [Associated Press, April 6, 2025.]
“According to Russia’s TASS news agency, at a court hearing in September, Tater claimed to have come to Russia seeking political asylum because he was being persecuted by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). He was scheduled to stand trial on April 14th of this year on charges of assaulting a police officer, which carries a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment. [Id.]
“The tale gets a big murky here. A Moscow court has ordered Tater admitted “non-voluntarily” to a psychiatric hospital on the basis of a medical evaluation on March 15th, when doctors described him as displaying signs of ‘tension, impulsivity, persecutory delusions, and lack of self-awareness regarding his condition.’ [Id.]
“Yet TASS had previously reported that he had been released from pretrial detention at the end of March. The two reports are obviously contradictory, and it is unclear when the court’s decision was actually rendered, or whether he ever was released at all.In any event, Tater is reportedly now living in the hell of a Russian psychiatric ward — a common practice in Soviet times that, according to human rights groups, is being increasingly employed by Vladimir Putin’s regime. His defense attorney has appealed his hospitalization on the grounds that it is an attempt to ‘isolate the defendant from society.’[Id.]”
Joseph Tater in Moscow Court
*. *. *
But you haven’t heard the strangest part yet. The recent article concerning his release from the psychiatric hospital “for outpatient treatment” then states — again according to TASS — that “Tater was no longer in Russia but that his current whereabouts were unclear.” [RFE/RL, op.cit.]
To muddy the waters still further, there has been no immediate comment by either the U.S. Embassy in Moscow or the State Department in Washington. However, a Kremlin source is quoted as saying that Tater was one of nine Americans being held in Russia that the U.S. wanted returned in a prisoner exchange as reportedly discussed between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump on May 20th. [Id.]
So the question remains: Where is Joseph Tater? If he’s not in a Russian prison or psychiatric hospital — in fact, not in Russia at all — and hasn’t been traded in order to return home to the U.S., then what has happened to him?
The Russian judicial system does not release foreign prisoners to wander the streets without a pre-arranged destination. If he has been receiving “outpatient treatment,” his whereabouts should be known. And if he is in U.S. custody, then the State Department should have an answer. Either he is still in Russia, or he isn’t.
There may, of course, be a logical explanation. I only hope it is a favorable one for Mr. Tater.
I grew up with Donald and his nephews, Huey, Dewey and Louie, along with all of their Disney friends. Their cartoons kept my generation, and my children’s generation, laughing at their silly, innocent antics.
But if the irrepressible, though sometimes irritable, little fellow were around today, and you were to ask him what he thought of the way the world has changed since his birth in 1934, I guarantee his answer would have been:
“Awww . . . phooey!”
And who could blame him?
But happy birthday anyway, Donald. (And sorry about that other guy with the same first name . . . )
It may be this decade’s ultimate irony. At the very least, it made one hell of a headline for Saturday’s “Wall Street Journal”:
“DOGE Staffers Fear Getting DOGE’d Themselves.”*
[* Scott Patterson and Ken Thomas, WSJ, June 7, 2025.]
They were mostly young, well-educated, but inexperienced; and they were suddenly given jobs of great responsibility and importance, no doubt flattered to have been the chosen ones, promised great things in terms of future prospects. They were working for the richest man in the world and the occupant of the Oval Office in Washington, D.C. They really can’t be blamed for their arrogance and stupidity.
But the men who created the agency that hired them — the two who will suffer no financial hardship or moral uncertainty whatsoever — are certainly to blame. Because now, all the young, naive agents of the so-called Department of Government Efficiency — DOGE — who were recruited to slash costs by cutting government jobs and creating massive unemployment, are having to face the possibility that they themselves may be the next in line at the unemployment office.
They are in jeopardy of being DOGE’d.
On a human level, I feel nothing but sympathy for anyone who, through no fault of their own, suddenly loses a job and a source of income. It is devastating, both emotionally and financially.
But looking at DOGE, not as a group of people but as its own entity — a dark, destructive, demonic, soul-sucking force, slashing away indiscriminately at everything in its path without a thought for the end result — well, then, the irony of the situation becomes almost too good to be true.
There are creatures on this earth — cockroaches, for example — that cling to life for a time even after the loss of their heads. And some other-worldly demons are said to be capable of resurrecting themselves after seemingly having been destroyed. While it remains to be seen whether DOGE will carry on without its head now that Elon Musk has fled Washington, it seems safe to assume that there will be changes . . . and possibly cutbacks in staff.
In all likelihood, DOGE — an illegitimate spawn from the time of its inception — will ultimately prove to be the genesis of its own destruction. Unfortunately, as with most of life’s mistakes, it will be the most vulnerable people who will suffer for it.
When we last dropped in on Washington’s version of the Hatfields and McCoys — could it have been only yesterday? — Steve Bannon had entered the scene to mix things up by suggesting a multi-pronged investigation of Elon Musk, whom he apparently considers to be the country’s Public Enemy #1.
So let’s catch up on the last 24 hours.
Later on Saturday, when asked by NBC News if he thought the relationship was at an end, Donald Trump himself replied, somewhat tersely: “I would assume so, yeah.” [Brandon Drenon, BBC News, June 7, 2025.]
As to Musk’s earlier threats to back Democratic candidates in the next elections, Trump said there would be “serious consequences” if that were to happen. But in a telephone interview with NBC News, he declined to comment further on what those consequences might be.
He did say — as to Steve Bannon’s suggestion of an investigation of Musk — that he had not yet had any discussions on that subject, and added that he had not thought about terminating any of the U.S. government’s contracts with Musk’s companies.
And when asked about the possibility of trying to repair their relationship, he replied:
“No. I have no intention of speaking to him.” [Nandita Bose, Reuters, June 7, 2025.]
“No!”
The spark that ignited this bonfire seems to have been Musk’s criticism of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” of which Trump is so nauseatingly proud: over 1,000 pages of what Musk — who would like us to believe he’s grown a conscience — called a “disgusting abomination” that would actually increase the budget deficit by some $2.4 trillion dollars over the next ten years. But Trump remains confident that the Senate will pass the bill by the upcoming 4th of July holiday, saying, with his usual brilliant clarity and articulation:
“In fact, yeah, people that were, were going to vote for it are now enthusiastically going to vote for it, and we expect it to pass.” [Id.]
And then the parrot so often seen perched on Trump’s shoulder, JD Vance, tossed in his two cents’ worth of gobbledegook, calling Musk’s criticism a “huge mistake,” and adding:
“I’m always going to be loyal to the president, and I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold. Maybe that’s not possible now because he’s gone so nuclear. But I hope it is.”
And then Vance inexplicably described Musk as an “incredible entrepreneur.” [Id.]
I just wish those two — Frick and Frack, or Abbott and Costello, or Trump and Vance, or whatever their names are — would get their stories straight before opening their mouths. Because we members of the public would really like to understand what the hell they’re saying.
One of the bloodiest, most notorious battles of Russia’s war against Ukraine took place in the early months of the invasion in Mariupol, a city on the Sea of Azov, where the last heroic defenders held out against the Russian onslaught in the Azovstal steel factory for three long months, from February 24th to May 20th. The difficulty of that battle has been a thorn in the Kremlin’s side for three years, leading Vladimir Putin to designate the Azov Brigade a terrorist organization and to call for its members to face tribunals and possible execution.
Little wonder, then, that those fighters who were taken alive, and remain in Russian captivity, have consistently been passed over for exchange during the bilateral prisoner swaps, including the most recent one on May 25th of this year.
Following completion of the last phase of the exchange of 1,000 prisoners, Denys Prokopenko, commander of the 12th Special Forces Brigade Azov, called the absence of any Azov fighters in the process a “disgrace to the entire state.” [Mykyta Peretiatko, RFE/RL, June 3, 2025.]
While Russia is generally being blamed for refusing to return any of the Azov prisoners, Prokopenko believes that Ukrainian officials are also at fault for sticking with a negotiating “mechanism that stopped working.” He has said:
“This feels like a mockery. If that were truly the case [that Russia was solely to blame], neither I nor other Azov fighters would have returned from captivity. [Id.]
Ukraine’s deputy head of the Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Andriy Yusov, disagreed and accused Russia of purposely complicating the exchange process in order to increase pressure on the Ukrainian government. He argued that “Our prisoners are in Putin’s hands . . . [Russian special services] exploit the prisoner issue for the purpose of warfare against Ukraine.” [Id.]
But, though Yusov is certainly not wrong, Prokopenko maintains that “We must find alternatives, offer them someone more valuable than a contracted soldier. Ukraine is packed with Russian agents; all our special services know this very well.” [Id.]
In other words, Ukraine should up the ante.
Regardless of the reasons for Russia’s continuing to stonewall the return of any members of the Azov Brigade, it is clear that three years is far too long a time to hold them when so many others have been sent home. The Ukrainian, European and U.S. negotiators must make this a priority in their continuing talks.
*. *. *
And in the meantime, here again is our list of those known to be held hostage of the Putin regime throughout Russia, Belarus and Ukraine:
Prisoners of War:
The People of Ukraine The Azov 12
Political Prisoners:
David Barnes Ales Bialiatski (in Belarus) Gordon Black Andrei Chapiuk (in Belarus) Antonina Favorskaya Konstantin Gabov Robert Gilman Stephen James Hubbard Sergey Karelin Ihar Karney (in Belarus) on Vadim Kobzev Darya Kozyreva Artyom Kriger Uladzimir Labkovich (in Belarus) Michael Travis Leake Aleksei Liptser Ihar Losik (in Belarus) Mikita Losik (in Belarus) Daniel Martindale Farid Mehralizada (in Azerbaijan) Nika Novak Marfa Rabkova (in Belarus) Igor Sergunin Dmitry Shatresov Robert Shonov Eugene Spector Valiantsin Stafanovic (in Belarus) Siarhei Tsikhanouski (in Belarus) Laurent Vinatier Robert Romanov Woodland Vladislav Yesypenko (in Crimea) Yuras Zyankovich (in Belarus)
As though this week’s exchanges between Donald Trump and Elon Musk weren’t enough to keep us amused, who should come crawling out from under his rock to add to the fun but Trump’s former friend and noted right-wing conspiracy theorist . . . none other than Steve Bannon.
And it sounds as though he may be trying to get back into Trump’s good graces. In addition to pushing for an unconstitutional third term for his ex-boss . . .
“Say what?!!”
. . . he is now taking Trump’s side against Musk by urging the administration to investigate the world’s wealthiest man for a variety of alleged misdeeds, including drug use, being in the pay of the Chinese government, and endangering national security in his role as head of DOGE.
Oh, and by the way — Bannon also questions Musk’s immigration status, and believes he may be subject to deportation.
In his own words:
“They have to do that. You have to take his security clearance. Investigate drug use and investigate his involvement [with China]. And you have to investigate his status as a citizen. If it turned out he overstayed visas and lied about it, it’s not right. It has to be investigated.” [Robert Costa, CBS News, June 6, 2025.]
I don’t know about you, but I haven’t had this much fun since I discovered “Would I Lie To You?” on British TV.
In April of this year, the Trump administration caused yet another furor over its tyrannical and unconstitutional methods of dealing with the country’s large — and largely law-abiding — immigrant population . . . this time, in the person of one Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Abrego Garcia, as you may recall, is a Salvadoran national, married to an American woman, who has been living in the United States since 2019 under a ruling by an immigration judge stating that he could not be deported to El Salvador because a gang there was targeting him and threatening him with death. He was never found to have had any connection with terrorist or other criminal organizations; and for six years, he has regularly checked in with immigration officials as required, and has never been convicted of a crime in the U.S.
But, in direct violation of a federal court order, Donald Trump and his henchmen in the Department of Justice decided he was a danger, labeled him a terrorist, and deported him to El Salvador, where he was immediately incarcerated in that country’s most notorious prison.
An order was issued by federal Judge Paula Xinis to return Abrego Garcia to the U.S., to which Trump adviser Stephen Miller responded on social media:
“Marxist judge now thinks she’s president of El Salvador.” [John Fritze and Devan Cole, CNN, April 7, 2025.]
And when DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni was asked under oath why Abrego Garcia couldn’t be returned to the U.S., he answered frankly:
“The first thing I did when I got this case on my desk is ask my clients the same question.” [Id.]
As a “reward” for his honesty, both Reuveni and his supervisor were placed on leave.
*. *. *
Two months have passed, during which the U.S. Supreme Court ordered the government to “facilitate” Abrego Garcia’s release from custody. Donald Trump responded that he would try, but that he couldn’t tell the president of El Salvador what to do. And, to no one’s surprise, Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele followed suit with his own gem:
“I hope you’re not suggesting that I smuggle a terrorist into the United States. How can I smuggle a terrorist into the United States? Of course I’m not going to do it. The question is preposterous.” [Kaitlan Collins and Kevin Liptak, CNN, April 14, 2025.]
Salvadoran President Bukele at the White House
Even when Senator Chris Van Hollen and Congressman Glenn Ivey refused to let the matter die, traveling to El Salvador in hopes of effecting the prisoner’s return, nothing happened, despite the government’s grudging admission that the deportation had been the result of an “administrative error.”
But now — after two months of delays — it seems that something has been happening behind the scenes after all: While the administration stalled, a case was being built and an indictment prepared against Abrego Garcia. That indictment — charging him with one count of conspiracy to transport aliens and one count of unlawful transportation of undocumented aliens — was unsealed in the federal district court in Nashville, Tennessee.
Apparently, all the Salvadoran president needed to change his mind was an arrest warrant. According to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi:
“Abrego Garcia has landed in the United States to face justice. This is what American justice looks like.” [Melissa Quinn, Jacob Rosen and Nicole Valdes, CBS News, June 6, 2025.]
If this is what Ameican justice looks like now . . .
Bondi said that the grand jury had found that Abrego Garcia “played a significant role in an alien smuggling ring” involving women and children, and is “a danger to our community,” adding that, if convicted, he would be returned to El Salvador after serving his sentence in the United States. She also claimed that he had played a role in the murder of a rival gang member’s mother, and solicited naked pictures from a minor — though neither of those allegations had been mentioned in the indictment. [Id.]
*. *. *
Whether Abrego Garcia is guilty or innocent will be for a judge and jury to decide. But regardless of the outcome, there is no doubt that this entire matter has been botched from beginning to end, and that this man has already been punished without the due process of law guaranteed him — and each of us — under the U.S. Constitution. As his attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said in a statement:
“[Due process] means the chance to defend yourself before you’re punished, not after. This is an abuse of power, not justice. [The government] disappeared Kilmar to a foreign prison in violation of a court order. Now, after months of delay and secrecy, they’re bringing him back, not to correct their error but to prosecute him.”
I would hope, as we all would, that he will receive a fair and impartial trial of the charges against him. But I have to ask: Why Tennessee? He lives in Maryland. Where are the alleged crimes supposed to have been committed? At first face, Tennessee seems an odd venue for his trial; and if there is a good reason for it, I’d very much like to know what it is.
The Blog About Everything … and Sometimes Nothing 